US President Donald Trump has presented a controversial proposal to resolve the Gaza crisis, which includes a mere 72-hour ultimatum to Hamas. Whether this is a diplomatic pressure tactic or a genuine peace effort has been a topic of intense debate among political experts.
The most controversial aspect of Trump’s proposal is that the “Board of Peace” will be chaired by Trump himself. Critics believe this is an attempt to prioritize American interests and establish American dominance in the Middle East. The claim of prior approval by Israel and several Arab nations is also questionable.
The lopsided ratio of the proposed prisoner-hostage swap (33 prisoners versus 1,950 prisoners) is striking. This arrangement appears to be highly beneficial to Hamas, raising questions about whether it is a genuine agreement or a political sham.
The establishment of a special economic zone in Gaza and the deployment of an international stabilization force are ambitious goals. However, implementing these plans is fraught with complex geopolitical challenges.
Trump’s proposal is undoubtedly bold, but it contains many controversial elements. The promise of Palestinian self-determination is attractive, but practical implementation is questionable. If Hamas accepts it, it could be a transformative moment in Middle East politics. In the event of rejection, the consequences could be disastrous. The next 72 hours will determine whether this proposal is a step toward peace or a display of political ambition.